CPS (free) HANDBOOK

[Marilyn LeBaron]

RULE 53 REFORM

'Luukinen's Repentence.
Polk County Circuis Court,
850 Main, Dallas Oregon, 97338
http://www.ojd.state.or.us/plk/index.htm

LeBaron v State of Oregon,
Melanie LeBaron 'a Child'

Please Invite The Following:

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Phone Numbers
Records/Court Operations [phone]
or [phone]
Criminal Records Office [phone]
TYY Number [phone]

THE NECK WHERE THREE HEADS OF THIS ’BEAST’ WE GROW.
To: Max R. Wall, Judge Avera C/O 'We the People'

http://www.myspace.com/marilynlebaron


Dear Judge Luukinen,

"Why is it that when men, who never stood in assembly, learn not the rules to which they are bound, but held accountable to that which they were never taught, and could not easily understand?",

"Why is it, when I do not hold men accountable to that which they did not recognize or understand to be law, men invent ways to keep that which is enforceable a secret?"

"How is it just, when in your first language, a request for bread is made, of which you have plenty, and My children were denied their request and given a cast instead?"

----- Only a Belligerent Claimant in person can defend rights. Rights cannot be defended by Attorney or Solicitor. United States v Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (DC, MD PA, 1947)

"How is it that when your second language, was never taught My children, you sit in My thrown and deny them bread, when that request is understood by your knowledge into their method of asking",

"How is it that you sat in My thrown, and enforced a commercialized, foreign standard, replacing My every Precept, erecting your own Decree above that which I declared Law unto My creation?"

----- "The right of a person under the 5th Amendment to refuse to incriminate himself is purely a personal privilege of the witness. It was never intended to permit him to plead the fact that some third person might be incriminated by his testimony, even though he were the agent of such person." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43:


"How is just, when you, in witness of My child while going in want, let them continue to hunger, failing to provide them with bread, you knowing they did not learn how to ask, having naught knowledge of your secret method, or language, while you clearly see what they should ask, and continuing to announce they should ask, also stating there is a secret method, and fail to teach them how?"

----- The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus. US v Johnson, 76 F. Supp 538, 540 (1947).


"How is it that when My children came, seeking My justice, they are ADJUDICATED by Precepts established for a minority, and are lead by your lack of adherence to My Statutes into Sodom and Gomorrah's rule instead?"

[dogettydoggonedo]

{Please Help}

Darlene Rogers Called The CPS On Me

My son called to warn us and he refused to stay home in the morning. She told him he may wind up in a foster home because I will not let her keep him. She is mad because ~I will not stop calling her a criminal about allowing a felon move in with my daughter when she was a foster kid. I reported her earlier today and sent her a text message demanding she send my son to his father and stay out of my life.

I did not tell her I had reported her I just complained that I would tell her whole family what I thought of her and asked her to help me impeach the CPS for failing my daughter by placing her there and then I reminded her she was impeached and could not do that because she would have to incriminate herself...

She also said she was going to get a restraning order against me because I was sending her text messages and voice mail she does not like.

When I reported her to the Foster Care Fraud Hotline, I was referred to the Sexual Assault Team, and I left a message that Jonathan Beau Couvillian was on probation when he moved in with Darlene Rogers at 2111 SE 154th Portland Oregon 97233 and she is supposed to have every adult screened before they are allowed contact with the Foster Child.

I have detailed recordings of all my phone contact with her and she never told me Beau was living there at her house. Not once. I reported I suspected it to the Independence Police Department and later I hear there is a No Contact Order that she requested 'lifted', because he was the father of Melanie's unborn. This I suspect was to provide an alibi because he was still living there I expect but am not sure. Only Melanie will know that.

My son has been instructed to say, "Your not my Council of Choice” and go back to his seat if he is contacted at school.

He did not call my text message 'crap' this time and was responsive to my directing him legally because Darlene mentioned he may wind up in Foster Care, too, since he does not want to live with his father and he put him there to let him choose who he wants of live with while she said pick me, pick me, and won, she immediately began putting words in his mouth because she knows what she told me about a large sum of money entrusted her and spent.

She told him that "It was a gift, to be repaid upon the need for a burial of the elderly woman that gave it to her”. I asked my son that on the very first visit he had with me and he told me she brought it up. She also brought it up to me Christmas before last and knew I would try to tell my son she was lacking in character regarding that issue and she was prepared. She is competitive and thinking ahead so Bleu will have a rebuttal for her in case his dad ever contacted me.

I'm told by Melanie that Bleu said she is going to try and prevent my visits with Victoria and that she thinks Bleu is going to be in a Foster home.

I think this is classic retaliation.

Please spread the word [sos]

If I wind up in court I need some help

Julie Witherspoon called and spoke to Darlene Rogers today and recorded her. She said she sounded like she was ok and that I should put up with her but I know better she is a double minded pretender.

Please get a copy of that and post it in your groups.

I'm in the middle of a Family Emergency here. I'm being falsely accused for things she knows about, which have been taking place for over 14 months now and she did not call the Child Abuse Hotline until I got on her nerves, which I knew I was squeezing and telling her to stay away from me and my family. I want nothing to do with her ever.

I have recording of her yelling at me...

because...

"Melanie won't let me baby sit Victoria because of you"... and

"You have not said a nice thing to me in years", and

"Don't you contradict me in front of your son", "I have letters that prove how bitter you are", "If you leave my house after dark you have to put up with me giving you a ride", "What about you, you humiliate me", "You talk bad about me to everybody", "I have a card from you sent to me long time ago and don't dare take it off my computer",

"Nobody calls me unless they want something", listing her son, boss and everybody else, as people that do that but her son Michael who never calls her and if he does she gets worried it is bad news.

Lots of weird junk all over the other recordings like...

"I know you'll be there every day",

"Your not calling to talk to me", "You’re using my minutes",

"You have not called me in years and now you call me twenty times a day", ... She had my son after convincing his dad Bleu is better off with her....