The Community Forum to Voice and Address Issues Affecting the Family

Pro Se Network

Information

Organized geographically to parallel the federal court jurisdictions! Also, general family rights *legal* discussions, plus connecting people who need help, with people who can give help, free or not.

Website: http://unitedcivilrights.org/prosenetwork.html
Location: all 11 main federal Circuits over 50 States
Members: 51
Latest Activity: Oct 16

Learn the Law for free online -- http://unitedcivilrights.org/publixlaw.html

Visit http://unitedcivilrights.org/publixlaw.html for good coverage on several legal fundamentals, including seven videos of Constitutional Class, instructed by Michael Badnarik (2004 Libertarian Presidental Candidate), who presents in very clear understanding. Also, there are several different online legal dictionaries, multiple caselaw search engines, primers on how to cite authorities, and more!
If all of that is beyond you at this time, and you need to request legal help, you can visit here for several resources, check on any of the 50 UCRCoA State yahoo groups of people, to see what they know already, and/or hire various experienced legal scholars within the movement, itself, for also various rates or agreements, etc.
If you are a legal scholar, and want to get involved in covering the above and various things for your own federal Circuit geography, please do visit the USA Pro Se Network directions page, and click to request joining the appropriate Circuit legal group for you.

Discussion Forum

RSS Feed - Justia.com - latest federal rulings on "Civil Rights"

Loading feed

Comment Wall (12 comments)

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Pro Se Network to add comments!

12 Comments

Comment by Phillip Bradshaw on October 16, 2009 at 1:19pm: Leonard Henderson is bringing the definitions of our legal system to the light of public opinion. Check out his articles in the Examiner:

Read the stories, submit comments, subscribe, FORWARD WIDELY. Get the word out. I am not pulling my punches. I am saying everything I think I can get away with to expose CPS and their nasty operation.

Leonard Henderson
Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right"
October 16, 11:25 AM
http://www.examiner .com/x-26520- Family-Rights- Examiner~ y2009m10d16- Best-Interest- of-the-Child- A-New-Civil- Right
============ ========= ====

The CPS case- What happens in the fog
October 15, 5:40 PM
http://www.examiner .com/examiner/ x-26520-Family- Rights-Examiner~ y2009m10d15- The-CPS-case- What-happens- in-the-fog
============ ========= ====
So many people want their story told
October 14, 3:00 PM
http://www.examiner .com/examiner/ x-26520-Family- Rights-Examiner~ y2009m10d14- So-many-people- want-their- story-told
============ ========= ====
If you are ever approached by CPS
October 12, 11:47 PM
http://www.examiner .com/examiner/ x-26520-Family- Rights-Examiner~ y2009m10d12- If-you-are- ever-approached- by-CPS
============ ========= ====
What's happening with Federal Government financed Child Welfare
October 12, 4:22 AM
http://www.examiner .com/x-26520- Family-Rights- Examiner~ y2009m10d12- Whats-happening- with-Federal- Government- financed- Child-Welfare

Comment by Tmac17540 on April 12, 2009 at 7:30pm: I filed a grievance against Judge Capper in Springfield Ohio I receive my letter back saying it was dropped and there is nothin they can do. What can I do next any suggestions???

Comment by FRED on September 12, 2008 at 9:22am: Hi, I'm looking for case law on regarding civil suits against DCF/CPS, Guradian Ad Litem, the court/county, against judges, etc. I am taking a jurisdictional approach. 1] Parental Rights are Paramount 2] may only be violated with highest order of unfitness, clear & present danger 3] most courts are just a fraud, racketeering, reckelessly usurp parental rights over false, frivilous, fraud. 4] thus, they lack legitimate jurisdiction 5] thus the court, DCF, experts, etc are all open to civil lawsuits 6] only shielding attacks on our custody/rights weakens us but strengthens the enemy - the corrupt dysfuntional custody industry. 7] only when we use the 'sword' of justice, counter attack, file counter claims and civil suits do we cause the enemy to lose blood and treasure, only then will they back off false, frivilous, reckless attacks on our custody, rights, and children.

Comment by Phillip Bradshaw on July 10, 2008 at 9:44pm: You have to move in a Civil Proceeding. The Quasi-judicial Administrative Hearings in "Dependency Court", are not constitutional because they are deemed to be "services". You are being processed as though it were charity. You need to file a Title 42 USC 1983 Claim in the State Court, listing all your objections and complaints, with a question aimed for the Supreme Court. Demand a Jury.

Comment by Phillip Bradshaw on June 9, 2008 at 6:59pm: Charity, where are you in Family Court?

Comment by Phillip Bradshaw on June 9, 2008 at 6:56pm: It has been three years since I went "over the top", and most of my work is on floppy discs stored across the country, so I went back to the Law Library to build the case from scratch. There are the Practice and Pleading volumes for forms and Jurisprudence for case Law, but it is also good to look at instructions on how to style your brief, like being sure to refer to reversible error, and to follow the format the court requires.

Comment by Richard on May 27, 2008 at 9:27pm: I had the dubious pleasure of being pro se for many years, in a very active 7 year divorce, and I wouldn't mind lending a hand where I can. One thing that worked for me was suing the ex, attorney and expert witness in civil court rather than family court, where even if I lost, they still had to pay their own legal expenses. Once I changed from supporting their lifestyle to later diminishing it, they didn't want anything to do with me. It also wasn't intertwined with "best interest of the child" which skews entire cases.

I also wouldn't mind seeing a library of pleadings, motions, etc. that people could draw on. All the pro se people have put in thousands of hours, and much of it could benefit others instead of just languishing on our hard drives.

Comment by Cinderella on May 19, 2008 at 3:59pm: Has anyone here heard of David MArtin Price??? Has great Pro Se info...he was on one of Ron's talk shows.

Comment by Sister Charity on May 4, 2008 at 3:31pm: Thanks Torm,
I will try to contact them as soon as I can. I'm headed to court on the 19th of June due to denial of visit in Wood county in front of Fantasia.

Comment by Joey'sMom on May 1, 2008 at 4:38pm: Hello, I have actually developed a portion of my business to provide Pro Se Coaching for family court litigants in Wi. I'm glad to see there is a Pro Se group here- because it is really needed!